Similarities:
1-Both theories emphasize social definitions-that is, how actors define social situations and their performance on the basis of these definitions.
2-Both theories have a micro-approach, which refers to daily life, thoughts and actions.
3-Both are considered as creative sociology, since they don’t consider actors as passive, but as active participants of social environment .
Could you please evaluate the criticism of ethnomethodology against sociology?
Criticisms on Traditional Sociology:
The first criticism ethnomethodology levels against sociology is that sociology is not adequately self-critical.
>> Selengkapnya
What does mean ethnomethodology?
It is the study of the methods people use in dealing with everyday reality. In his book, Ritzer says: “Ethnomethodology means the methods people use every day” (Ritzer, 1386: 364).
What is Morris Rosenberg’ view about Self?
Although Rosenberg was not primarily a symbolic interactionist, but he proposed the concept of “self-perception”. According to him, self perception is the comprehensiveness of thoughts and feelings that a person has when referring to himself as an objective cognition.
>> Selengkapnya
Pragamatisme dalam Simbolik Interaksionis
Aspek Pragmatisme dalam aliran Simbolik Interaksionis:
A-Menurut pragmatis, tidak ada realitas sejati di dunia nyata “di luar”, melainkan, selama performa kita di dunia yang secara aktif dibuat dan dibentuk.
>> Selengkapnya
Berpikir ala Barat dan Islam
Pelajaran hari ini adalah mengevaluasi perbuatan dan pikiran. >> Selengkapnya
I see, therefore I find
I see, therefore I find
Catatan hari adalah perkataan Taha Abdulrrahman. >> Selengkapnya
Konsistensi Berpikir, Bersikap, Bertindak
Pelajaran yang bisa di petik hari adalah konsistensi. >> Selengkapnya
Takut dan Berharaplah!!!
Takut dan Berharaplah!!!
Catatan hari adalah tentang ceramah seorang kyai muda di Youtube. >> Selengkapnya
Logika koneksi
Suatu pagi >> Selengkapnya